For many years in the USA there was a discussion about the fate of children who were illegally brought into the country by their parents, grew up here, graduated (or graduated) from school or colleges, got a profession, many work successfully and pay taxes to the American treasury, some served in the American army. Their mother tongue is English, and their lifestyle is based on American values. However, officially these young people are considered illegal immigrants and are subject to expulsion from the United States. In 2012, President Obama issued a Decree of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a temporary measure (2 years) that does not provide permanent resident status for people who arrived in the United States before the age of 16 years and under 30 at the time of issuance of the Decree , gave them a “status default action”, which not only protects against deportation, but also provides the opportunity to receive a social insurance card, the right to work, and car rights. Subsequently, the Decree was extended several times. President Trump, who arrived at the White House in 2016, immediately expressed a desire to close the program in accordance with his campaign promise, recognize young people who fall under her program as illegal illegal immigrants and begin their deportation. He officially formalized his desire in September 2017, after the failure of an agreement with the Democratic Congress to exchange his consent for the continuation of the program for the necessary funds for the construction of the wall on the border with Mexico. However, in November 2018, the San Francisco 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that President Trump’s administration should continue with the ex-President Obama’s DACA program, which protects hundreds of thousands of immigrants smuggled into the country from deportation as children. According to the judges, the decision of the authorities to abandon the DACA was "unauthorized and not in accordance with the law." The case was sent to a higher court, which is the US Supreme Court. Do not forget that Trump during his cadence managed to hold two conservative judges N. Gorsach and B. Cavanaugh, so the advantage was on the side of the Republicans 5: 4. All the more unexpected was the verdict issued by the Supreme Court in June, which ruled the Trump administration’s attempts to end the DACA program illegal. Usually Conservative President of the Court D. Roberts, appointed by President D. Bush, in this case, joined the liberal wing of four judges. In principle, both the lower courts and most judges of the Supreme Court recognized that Trump, as the head of the executive branch, had the right to suspend the program. However, the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 establishes that the actions of state bodies must be carried out by justification. They cannot be performed arbitrarily and must be supported by objective data. The judges considered that these conditions were not met. So, unexpected (according to Trump himself) was the decision of the Supreme Court prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Not only D. Roberts, but also one of Trump's appointees, N. Gorsach, voted for the illegality of discrimination against LGBT people in employment, which led to the victory of the liberal point of view 6: 3. Trump promised to still try to collapse the DACA again, this time issuing everything in accordance with the letter of the law. However, in connection with the situation in the country (ongoing pandemic and protests), it is doubtful that he will have the opportunity to do this before the election. Nobody knows what their result will be.
Date Added: 06/24/2020 |
Last Updated: 06/24/2020 |
Page Views: 379
I lost both love and faith in myself. After turning to Lilia, my life began to change. Not right away, but with each passing day, it became brighter. Two weeks later, we met by chance, then texting, calling, and then we were back together. He said he'd felt all this time that he should come back. It was as if Lilia had opened his eyes. I thank her for her heart, her kindness, and the strength she shares. TEL/WhatsApp/Viber: +380638055486 USA/Canada: +19297133433
I turned to Lilia during a difficult time, when my relationship with my husband was literally hanging by a thread. We lived next to each other, but it was as if we were in different worlds. After talking with Lilia, I felt like I was awakening: I realized I needed to change how I spoke, how I listened. Gradually, the tension eased, and warmth returned to the house. Now we are a real family again. I am incredibly grateful to Lilia for her support. Overall, I highly recommend Lilia... +380638055486 +19297133433
Reviews of clairvoyants who really help: a verified clairvoyant and tarot reader
I recently consulted a very talented clairvoyant and tarot reader, and I can say she truly helped me. It was a challenging task: my relationship with my loved one was on the brink of collapse, and I couldn't figure out what to do. She immediately identified the problem, helped me get rid of the negative energy, and, amazingly, restored harmony to my relationship. She also accurately predicted the future and told me how to avoid certain mistakes. I truly felt a huge weight lifted from my soul. I thank her for her help, and I highly recommend her! She also removes curses and blockages; her energy is very powerful. For an appointment, please contact: +16463779379
Miracles happen, and one of them was meeting Lily.
Miracles happen, and meeting Lilia was one of them. My husband and I were going through a difficult time in our relationship, but with her help, we found a path to mutual understanding and love. Lilia didn't just help me get my husband back; she taught us to truly appreciate each other. Our family is back together, and I'm grateful to Lilia for her professionalism and sincerity! I'll leave my contact information (+380638055486 for WhatsApp and Viber, +19297133433 for regular calls).